- Mar 04 8:49 am
#74784
There is one more element of this situation that people should be aware of.
When businesses propose projects on public lands, environmental consultants are hired to assist them with government mandated environmental research, mitigation, and protection. Unfortunately, as the law stands now, none of this has to be disclosed to the public in a specific way. Essentially, all that the proponent has to provide to the public, is a statement that such efforts were made. This is very bad policy, for a number of reasons. I won't get into the moral and ethical needs for transparency here, although that is probably the more vital aspect of this. However, even from the perspective of simply a user group interested in the results of pre-assessment surveys, this information is critically important.
In a province the size of British Columbia, with its varied and unique landscape, with much of it still undeveloped and not easy to access, there are still many discoveries to be made. There have been relatively few birders ever in many areas, and virtually no systematic surveys performed in surprisingly large areas of the province. With the end of government research over the past 25 years, private consultants are really the only force on the ground, and some of the best birders in this province are conducting the research related to birds. Sadly, most of us have a legal gun held to our heads, that prohibits us from not only releasing the data, but also for even discussing it, both privately and publicly. Thus, the information that they are gathering goes to write reports that virtually no one will ever see, and the data is generally never seen even by government employed biologists charged with protecting habitat and species. Quite honestly, much of this data ends up in the garbage a few years after the projects are built.
I could rant on for pages about this, but I think I've made my point. The laws related to projects on public lands need to be completely overhauled, and the public should have full access to the data gathered. I guess I should also mention that the public did have that right of access, until Harper came to power. Previous to changes made by the Harper Conservatives, much of this type of information was available online, as part of the assessment process.
Maybe if everyone wrote to their MP to let them know they have a problem with the way things are being done with environmental assessments on public lands?
Guy L. Monty
Nanoose Bay, Vancouver island, BC